SMART Goals EvaluationThink back to the five SMART goals you created earlier in the


SMART Goals Evaluation

Think back to the five SMART goals you created earlier in the term. Write a reflection paper following APA format and consisting of 750-1000 words in length. Then, create a 5–7-minute reflection video using the word document which evaluates each SMART goal that you created. Use Teams, Zoom, or Canvas Studio’s Screen Capture feature to record your presentation.  Your face must be visible on camera (in the corner as you present your paper). You must introduce yourself and show your identification. You must dress professionally or your presentation will not be graded. 

Use the following questions to guide your response:   

1. What were you expecting from the experience before you started?   

2. Why were you expecting this?   

3. Why did you choose this goal?   

4. Did you learn anything about a different group in society (i.e., different age, profession, ethnic, racial or socio-economic group)? What did you learn?   

5. What is the most valuable experience you acquired?  

6. What impact did the experience have on your everyday life?   

7. What did you learn that was directly related to your course objectives? 

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your paper as a Word Document through the Turnitin inbox below.

· Follow all directions for this assignment.

· This Assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.

SMART Goal Evaluation Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Content Reflection

15 to >10 pts

Exemplary

Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.

10 to >5 pts

Accomplished

Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and course materials, activities, and/or assignments

/ 15 pts

Personal Growth

20 to >15 pts

Exemplary

Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

13 The actual needs assessment survey conducted among the

1 3 The actual needs assessment survey conducted among the members of a local Sikh Temple revealed several significant health risks connected to communicable diseases. This evaluation was done through interviews, focus group discussions, and observations during community activities to establish the population’s prospects of gaining a better health status.

Name: Ana Hernandez Institution: FNU Course: Decision Making-DBX-DL01 Professor: Dr. Nora Hernandez-Pupo Date: 12/4/2024Discussion on

Name: Ana Hernandez Institution: FNU Course: Decision Making-DBX-DL01 Professor: Dr. Nora Hernandez-Pupo Date: 12/4/2024 Discussion on Ethical Sensitivity and Emotional Intelligence in Nursing Practice Ethical sensitivity in nursing is the ability to recognize ethical issues, dilemmas, and the potential impact of decisions on patients, colleagues, and healthcare outcomes. It involves

Celia Delgado Florida National University MSN Capstone Project 12/04/2024 Measurement

Celia Delgado Florida National University MSN Capstone Project 12/04/2024   Measurement Tools for Research Evaluation It is fundamentally important to choose the right measurement tools for evaluating the research results accurately while doing research. Depending on the research design, tools available for measurement include surveys, interviews, observation checklists, standardized tests,

Instructions are attachedRubricSignature AssignmentCriteria

Instructions are attached Rubric Signature Assignment Criteria Ratings/Comments Points Format: (Length of Paper: At least 6 pages, do not exceed 8 pages (excludes cover page, references and appendices). Tables can be placed in Appendix, but in-text content still needed/summarized for the corresponding section. Required plagiarism review: All papers will be

Purpose This assignment increases the students’ awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developed by The Joint Commission. Specifically, this

Purpose This assignment increases the students’ awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developed by The Joint Commission. Specifically, this assignment will introduce the Speak Up Initiatives, an award-winning patient safety program designed to help patients promote their own safety by proactively taking charge of their healthcare. Course outcomes: This