Question are in the home work section  Chapters are in the other one.Reflection and Discussion Forum Week 3Chapter are provided.

Question are in the home work section 

Chapters are in the other one.

Reflection and Discussion Forum Week 3

Chapter are provided.

Assigned Readings:

Chapter 7. Ethical Issues in the Global Arena

Chapter 8. Business Ethics and Technology: The Digital Enterprise

Chapter 9. Corporate Governance: Foundational Issues


Initial Postings:
 Read and reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Then post what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding in each assigned textbook chapter. Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook should be a source listed in your reference section and cited within the body of the text. Other sources are not required but feel free to use them if they aid in your discussion.

Question 2 Discussion where we have to response or just answer the question.

Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:

1. Do you think genetically modified organisms (GMOs) raise a legitimate safety hazard? Should government agencies such as the FDA and USDA take more action to require safety testing? Do you think labeling unfairly stigmatizes GMOs and makes consumers question their safety?

2. As an MNC seeks to balance and honor the ethical standards of both the home and host countries, conflicts inevitably will arise. What criteria do you think managers should consider as they try to decide whether to use home or host country ethical standards? Does the use of hypernorms help? Explain.

[Your post must be substantive and demonstrate insight gained from the course material. 
Postings must be in the student’s own words – do not provide quotes!]

 [Your initial post should be at least 
450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review]


Submitting the Initial Posting:
Your initial posting should be completed by 
Thursday, 11:59 p.m. EST. 


Response to Other Student Postings
:  Respond substantively to the post of at least two peers, by 
Friday, 11:59 p.m. EST. A peer response such as “I agree with her,” or “I liked what he said about that” or similar comments are not considered substantive and will not be counted for course credit.

[Continue the discussion through 
Sunday,11:59 p.m. EST by highlighting differences between your postings and your colleagues’ postings. Provide additional insights or alternative perspectives]


Evaluation of posts and responses: 
Your initial posts and peer responses will be evaluated on the basis of the kind of critical thinking and engagement displayed. The grading rubric evaluates the content based on seven areas:

Content Knowledge & Structure, Critical Thinking, Clarity & Effective Communication, Integration of Knowledge & Articles, Presentation, Writing Mechanics, and Response to Other Students.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

SEE ATTACHEDTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

SEE ATTACHEDTCOB Graduate Studies Discussion RubricCriteria No Submission 0 pointsNovice (Criterion is missing or notin evidence) 1-13

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of